2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Caserta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Caserta would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 682 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | CTS | Caserta |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 936 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 55 L |
