2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 MG X10

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X10 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2001 MG X10. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X10.

Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X10, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X10 has automatic transmission and 2002 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2002 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X10 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: