2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 Ford Model U
To start off, 2003 Ford Model U is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac CTS | 2003 Ford Model U | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Model U |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
