2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 Honda Mobilio
To start off, 2003 Honda Mobilio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2003 Honda Mobilio. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Mobilio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 358 kg more than 2003 Honda Mobilio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Mobilio. (143 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Mobilio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 2003 Honda Mobilio | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | CTS | Mobilio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |