2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Hummer H1
To start off, 2006 Hummer H1 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 6,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H1 (300 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H1 should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Hummer H1 weights approximately 1344 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Hummer H1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Hummer H1 (705 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Hummer H1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac CTS. 2006 Hummer H1 has automatic transmission and 2002 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2002 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Hummer H1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 2006 Hummer H1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
Model | CTS | H1 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 6604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 705 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 103.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2904 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 195 L |