2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2007 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2007 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2007 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Isuzu I-350 (329 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 2007 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | CTS | I-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 329 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 74 L |