2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX

To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 586 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 438 kg more than 2009 Koenigsegg CCX.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 623 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac CTS. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2009 Koenigsegg CCX has manual transmission. 2009 Koenigsegg CCX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Cadillac CTS 2009 Koenigsegg CCX
Make Cadillac Koenigsegg
Model CTS CCX
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Sedan Roadster
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 3173 cc 4719 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 220 HP 806 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6900 RPM
Torque 296 Nm 919 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 5700 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.6:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1618 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4293 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1996 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1120 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2660 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]