2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2011 Lancia Musa

To start off, 2011 Lancia Musa is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2011 Lancia Musa. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2011 Lancia Musa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 282 kg more than 2011 Lancia Musa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lancia Musa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Lancia Musa. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Lancia Musa.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Cadillac CTS 2011 Lancia Musa
Make Cadillac Lancia
Model CTS Musa
Year Released 2002 2011
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3179 cc 1248 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 296 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 1750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 69.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 82 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1278 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4040 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.9 L/100km 4.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 47 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]