2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vanquish
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vanquish is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vanquish is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Vanquish weights approximately 121 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vanquish (620 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vanquish will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 2013 Aston Martin Vanquish | |
Make | Cadillac | Aston Martin |
Model | CTS | Vanquish |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 620 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1739 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2067 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1294 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 78 L |