2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac CTS would be higher.
Because 2013 Suzuki SX4 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Suzuki SX4 has automatic transmission and 2002 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2002 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Suzuki SX4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac CTS | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | CTS | SX4 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
