2002 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 2002 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Because 1978 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (406 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac DeVille | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 406 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2650 mm |