2002 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 2002 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (406 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac DeVille | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Donkervoort |
Model | DeVille | S7 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 406 Nm | 163 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1080 mm |