2002 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Eldorado (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2013 Ford EDGE. (281 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford EDGE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 110 kg more than 2002 Cadillac Eldorado.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Eldorado (407 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford EDGE. (343 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford EDGE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Eldorado | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Eldorado | EDGE |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4679 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2223 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2824 mm |