2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 563 kg more than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | Escalade | Sixty |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5966 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2678 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 82 L |