2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1550 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (447 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Escalade | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 133 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 57 L |