2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1973 ZIL 114
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1973 ZIL 114. (296 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1973 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 ZIL 114 weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 Cadillac Escalade.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 ZIL 114. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 ZIL 114 (580 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac Escalade. (447 Nm). This means 1973 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac Escalade | 1973 ZIL 114 | |
| Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
| Model | Escalade | 114 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 6959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 580 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 3180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3770 mm |
