2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1433 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Escalade | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5966 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2678 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |