2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (380 Nm) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Escalade | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5966 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 94 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |