2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1766 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Escalade | 616 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5966 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2678 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2480 mm |