2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | Escalade | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |