2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2009 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2009 Lincoln MKS. (273 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2009 Lincoln MKS.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lincoln MKS. (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lincoln MKS.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 2009 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | Escalade | MKS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5966 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |