2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 138 kg more than 2011 Fisker Karma.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Escalade | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Cadillac | Fisker |
Model | Escalade | Karma |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2678 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 36 L |