2002 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 2011 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2011 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac Escalade | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Escalade | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5966 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2490 mm |
