2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 374 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans weights approximately 395 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac Le Mans | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | Le Mans | E Type |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2450 mm |
