2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 1973 Honda 1300

To start off, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 519 more horse power than 1973 Honda 1300. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans weights approximately 900 kg more than 1973 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (400 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 1300. (105 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac Le Mans will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 1300.

Compare all specifications: