2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans weights approximately 595 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Le Mans | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Le Mans | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2560 mm |