2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 1992 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac Le Mans | 1992 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Le Mans | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2460 mm |
