2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 1997 Volvo V90

To start off, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo V90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo V90 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 422 more horse power than 1997 Volvo V90. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 1997 Volvo V90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans weights approximately 180 kg more than 1997 Volvo V90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (400 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo V90. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac Le Mans will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo V90. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans has automatic transmission and 1997 Volvo V90 has manual transmission. 1997 Volvo V90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: