2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 2010 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2010 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Le Mans would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 290 more horse power than 2010 Lincoln Navigator. (310 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 2010 Lincoln Navigator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 842 kg more than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (494 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. (400 Nm). This means 2010 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Le Mans | 2010 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | Le Mans | Navigator |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 310 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 494 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 2637 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1989 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3023 mm |