2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Le Mans would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL. (518 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 291 kg more than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL (630 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. (400 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Le Mans | 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Le Mans | CL |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 518 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 2086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5065 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2954 mm |