2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Le Mans would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 393 more horse power than 2010 Mercedes-Benz G. (207 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 2010 Mercedes-Benz G.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G (540 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. (400 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Le Mans | 2010 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Le Mans | G |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 540 Nm |
Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4686 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |