2002 Cadillac Seville vs. 1963 Maserati 151

To start off, 2002 Cadillac Seville is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati 151 (425 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac Seville. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac Seville. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 944 kg more than 1963 Maserati 151.

Because 1963 Maserati 151 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Maserati 151. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac Seville has automatic transmission and 1963 Maserati 151 has manual transmission. 1963 Maserati 151 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac Seville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: