2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1950 Chrysler Windsor
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 4,920 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1950 Chrysler Windsor. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1950 Chrysler Windsor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Chrysler Windsor weights approximately 196 kg more than 2002 Cadillac XLR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac XLR | 1950 Chrysler Windsor | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | XLR | Windsor |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4570 cc | 4920 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 316 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3210 mm |
