2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1953 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 146 kg more than 2002 Cadillac XLR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1953 Hudson Hornet has manual transmission. 1953 Hudson Hornet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1953 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Cadillac | Hudson |
Model | XLR | Hornet |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 4810 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2990 mm |