2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1965 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1965 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1022 kg more than 1965 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac XLR (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1965 Renault Dauphine | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | XLR | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 58 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |