2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1971 Fiat ESV
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 2002 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac XLR (407 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1971 Fiat ESV | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | XLR | ESV |
Year Released | 2002 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 134 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |