2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1977 Ford LTD
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford LTD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford LTD would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Ford LTD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1977 Ford LTD. (296 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford LTD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Ford LTD weights approximately 136 kg more than 2002 Cadillac XLR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Ford LTD (525 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac XLR. (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1977 Ford LTD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac XLR.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1977 Ford LTD | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | XLR | LTD |
Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 525 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3080 mm |