2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1981 Skoda L
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1981 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 829 kg more than 1981 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac XLR (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1981 Skoda L | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | XLR | L |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 1044 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |