2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1984 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 748 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1984 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | XLR | XJR |
Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 90 L |