2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1999 Ford O21 C
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford O21 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford O21 C would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1999 Ford O21 C. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford O21 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 356 kg more than 1999 Ford O21 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford O21 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac XLR (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford O21 C. (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford O21 C.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1999 Ford O21 C | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | XLR | O21 C |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |