2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1999 Isuzu VX-02
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Isuzu VX-02. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Isuzu VX-02 would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1999 Isuzu VX-02. (227 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1999 Isuzu VX-02.
Because 1999 Isuzu VX-02 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Isuzu VX-02 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac XLR (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Isuzu VX-02. (320 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Isuzu VX-02.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1999 Isuzu VX-02 | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | XLR | VX-02 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1500 mm |