2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 388 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac XLR (407 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac XLR | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | XLR | C 52 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4570 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2830 mm |