2002 Cadillac XLR vs. 2006 Ford E-350

To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 834 kg more than 2002 Cadillac XLR.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac XLR. (407 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac XLR.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Cadillac XLR 2006 Ford E-350
Make Cadillac Ford
Model XLR E-350
Year Released 2002 2006
Body Type Convertible Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4570 cc 5408 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 316 HP 255 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 475 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1654 kg 2488 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 2120 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 3510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 132 L