2002 Caterham Superlight R vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Caterham Superlight R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Caterham Superlight R would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Caterham Superlight R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Caterham Superlight R (190 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Caterham Superlight R should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2002 Caterham Superlight R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Caterham Superlight R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Caterham Superlight R | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | Superlight R | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2490 mm |