2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1962 DAF 600
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Astro | 1962 DAF 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | Astro | 600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 45 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 65 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 28 L |