2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1624 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Astro | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Astro | 25 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 456 kg |
