2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1963 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Astro | 1963 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Astro | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2290 mm |