2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1967 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Astro | 1967 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
| Model | Astro | Charger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 6981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
