2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Astro | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Astro | 140 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |