2002 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1981 Mazda 323
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1981 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Astro | 1981 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Astro | 323 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1069 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2370 mm |